CWYS (Confirm What You See) data signing functionality.Ability to assign different types of tokens to different users.Īt the same time there are few features we weren’t able to find equivalents in Duo’s 2FA product:.Differentiation and delegation of authority within the system.Features available to users in both 2-factor authentication services include: In terms of features, Protectimus two-factor authentication service is not inferior to Duo’s in any way. Note: All features examined in this section are available with all payment plans, including the no-cost Protectimus Free plan. You can find out more about these features by reading “ Duo Security vs Protectimus: Features.” Protectimus This function was developed because Duo Security emphasizes mobile authentication, and mobile devices are rather vulnerable. It checks the mobile devices with the Duo Mobile app installed on hygiene, operating system, browser, plugins, and whether screenlocks and biometrics are enabled, offering protection against viruses, hacking attacks, and unlocking by curious passers-by. Device access policies allowing the administrator to control which devices can access the applications. Role-based access policies allowing the administrator to impose custom (stricter) authentication requirements for users with the highest access level.Prohibiting access from anonymous networks.Self-service is also available in the Duo MFA basic plan.ĭuo offers a range of additional features to make administration easy and increase the level of resource access protection: Note: Nearly all features examined in this section can be activated only with Duo’s most expensive payment plans, Access and Beyond. You can find out more about the differences between the cloud-based service and the platform here. Lifetime licenses for the platform can also be purchased. Both the on-premise platform and cloud-based service are available with a subscription. For these cases, we made it possible to purchase an on-premise platform that clients can install in their own environments, allowing them to retain full control of the authentication server. However, some companies can’t make use of cloud-based services because of strict information security rules, either from within the company or imposed by the government. The result is rapid integration with minimal costs. Clients connected to the Protectimus SaaS service don’t need to waste time and money on extra equipment, security measures, and sysadmin salaries - there’s no load balancing or other infrastructure issues to worry about. Often, we advise customers to choose the cloud-based service, since it’s convenient, fast, and modern. Protectimus two-factor authentication solution is available not only in cloud-based form but also as an on-premise platform. In addition, it’s a rather modern approach to strong authentication, so it fits well with Duo Security’s concept as a modern, innovative provider of revolutionary MFA solutions. This style of interaction is convenient and easy for the client and company alike. It makes integration fast and reduces the cost of deploying, protecting, and maintaining an authentication server. The choice of the SaaS model is completely logical. Server-side component Duo Securityĭuo is a cloud-based 2FA solution. In light of that, has Cisco made the right decision? Should they maybe have spent $2.35 billion on acquiring Protectimus instead? We’ve decided to compare the solutions from Duo and Protectimus to settle the matter objectively.ĭON’T LIKE LONG READS? FIND OUR CONCLUSIONS IN A COMPARISON TABLE AT THE END OF THE ARTICLE. Hardware tokens are also among the products we offer, and they can be connected to practically any site: from Google, Facebook, Dropbox, and Slack to cryptocurrency exchanges like Bitfinex, Coinbase, Poloniex, and so on. This is much more efficient, secure, and convenient than SMS. For example, in order to hasten the move away from SMS authentication to more modern, reliable MFA technologies, we’ve figured out how to deliver one-time passwords using chatbots on messaging services. Protectimus fully supports Duo Security’s efforts to simplify and reduce the cost of OTP delivery, but we remain convinced that security must not be sacrificed in the process. This also shows that there is a demand for simpler, less expensive means of delivering one-time passwords, since Duo prominently advertises its rejection of hardware tokens in favor of 2FA apps, push notifications, and SMS messages (which are expensive and not secure). A sale of this magnitude confirms that the demand for two-factor authentication is higher than ever before. Naturally, this is an important event not only for Duo Security, but for the entire multi-factor authentication industry. Recently, Cisco declared its intention to purchase Duo Security for US$2.35 billion.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |